Loading...
Loading...
Regulations decoded. Compliance simplified.
Why it matters: Legal risk: creating or sharing non-consensual intimate deepfakes can now trigger criminal charges under the UK Data Act; treat generated sexual imagery as potentially illegal content.
Why it matters: Expect stricter takedown and consent rules—platforms and vendors may face higher compliance and reporting obligations in Germany and potentially across the EU.
Why it matters: Chatbot operators must implement and document crisis-detection protocols and referrals (e.g., link to 988) or face enforcement under Washington’s consumer-protection law.
Why it matters: Preserve evidence: retain model logs, prompts, outputs, and metadata for audits, explainability, and legal review.
Why it matters: Compliance window: Legal and security teams should finalize a Frontier AI Framework and internal reporting procedures before Jan 1, 2026 to avoid civil penalties.
Why it matters: Audit training datasets now — the extended deadline (February 6, 2026) gives time to identify copyrighted sources and verify licenses.
Why it matters: Inventory models, training data sources, and safety testing now—August 2, 2026 is the compliance deadline.
Why it matters: Reconcile state rules effective Jan 1, 2026 with forthcoming federal rulemaking to reduce dual-enforcement risk; prioritize a gap analysis and mapped controls by jurisdiction.
Why it matters: Incident response: Test model-safety controls, exercise rollback plans, and treat generation failures as platform-level incidents.
Why it matters: Patch model safety: fix generation and prompt controls to block non-consensual sexualized content and imagery of minors.
Why it matters: Platforms must implement labeling and logging to meet disclosure and accountability requirements.
Why it matters: Designate compliance leads: have engineering, safety and legal map models to New York’s "frontier" criteria and document controls.
Why it matters: Engineering teams: AAIF-aligned standards reduce custom integration work and accelerate safer, composable agent deployments.
Why it matters: The DOJ task force (launch within 30 days) signals litigation will be a primary federal tool — states with enacted AI laws are likely early defendants.
Why it matters: Prepare for national oversight: expect designated national supervisors and implementing rules effective January 2026; update compliance roadmaps and points-of-contact now.
Why it matters: Clarify definitions: consistent AI definitions reduce legal risk for firms and speed compliance work for legal-tech vendors.
Why it matters: Inventory first: automated agent discovery is table stakes—if you can’t find agents running in your environment, you can’t govern them. Prioritize discovery across cloud and edge.
Why it matters: Procurement risk: Federal agencies may require vendors to comply with the national AI framework as a condition for contracts and grants.
Why it matters: Legal risk: Vendors that create or distribute non‑consensual “nudification” tools face criminal exposure in the UK from Dec 19, 2025; review contracts, distribution channels, and takedown procedures now.